2010-03-19, 12:43 AM
That was incredibly fast!
It's such a little used instruction, unless you're going for an encrypted loader, or possibly something in the random number department.
In my case, I was doing some timing tests and wanted my input data to change each cycle.
Incidentally, your 16 bit multiply is faster than the one I was thinking of suggesting.
My 8 bit one still wins though 8)
Jose, I have to keep saying how much I appreciate your efforts to make this compiler so good. And it's awesome.
It's such a little used instruction, unless you're going for an encrypted loader, or possibly something in the random number department.
In my case, I was doing some timing tests and wanted my input data to change each cycle.
Incidentally, your 16 bit multiply is faster than the one I was thinking of suggesting.
My 8 bit one still wins though 8)
Jose, I have to keep saying how much I appreciate your efforts to make this compiler so good. And it's awesome.