A For-Next bug in 1.2.8-s682

[boriel]

I also agree with both Britlion and you. I'm going to implement this behaviour by default. If the programmer wants the dynamic behaviour s/he will be able to enable it using something like:

Code:

#pragma for dynamic

or

Code:

#pragma for static

which will be enabled by default (needs not to be used unless you want to switch from/to dynamic for). What do you think?